A course is a project. A thesis is a longer one.

Nobody hands a student a project plan, and nobody hands a lab group one either. Noots gives the module, the study and the thesis each their own board, timeline and files; sits in on supervisions and group meetings and hands back the decisions plus a list of actions with names against them; and keeps the dates that do not move - submission, review, the defence - in front of everyone working toward them.

7 apps queued at setup - untick any of them before you finish
A new project in this workspace

Default project tabs

OverviewBoardListTimelineFilesMeetingsCalendarMembersGoals

Files and Timeline carry the papers and the fixed deadlines, Goals tracks the term's outcomes; Capacity and Budget are off - a study group is not resourced like an agency.

Projects created on day one

  • Research
  • Coursework
  • Thesis & Writing
Made for Academia & Research

The three that do the heavy lifting.

Choose this industry during setup and its tools are queued for you. Review the list, drop anything you don't want, and the workspace initialises with the rest already working - or install any one of them on its own, later, from the marketplace.

Queued at setup

Codex

The group's memory, and it outlives whoever wrote it: literature notes, protocols, onboarding and how-tos as searchable pages, every change stamped with who touched it and when.

  • Pages grouped by category, searchable
  • Protocols and reading notes beside the work
  • Every edit stamped with author and time
  • The person who joins in October reads it on day one
Queued at setup

Experiment Log

Every run gets a hypothesis, the metric it is meant to move, and a verdict - won, lost or inconclusive - so a question the group already settled does not get asked again in March.

  • Hypothesis and primary metric per entry
  • Status: running, won, lost, inconclusive
  • The outcome and what you learned, recorded
  • One shared log, so a null result is still a result
Queued at setup

Polls & Surveys

Post the question once and watch the tally as the votes land. It settles “when do we meet” as well as it settles “which paper are we presenting”, and neither answer gets lost in a thread.

  • Single- or multiple-choice questions
  • Live tallies as the votes land
  • Settles “when do we meet” in one post
  • The answer stays visible, not buried in chat
A day on the tools

What changes, in the hours it actually changes.

Three moments from an ordinary week. Every one of them is a thing the product does, not a thing it could be configured to do one day.

1

09:00

supervision, and what was agreed survives it

The weekly supervision happens on Meet, Teams, Zoom or a Noots call and the bot sits in. What comes back is not an hour of audio you will never replay: it is the decisions, and a list of actions each landing on the thesis board with a name against it. Next week opens on what was agreed rather than on what anyone remembers.

2

13:30

five timetables, one free hour

A poll settles the slot, the meeting lands on everyone's calendar, and the project board says who took the slides, who took the data section and what is still unclaimed. “I thought you were doing that” stops being how a group finds out, a week before the deadline.

3

17:00

the draft goes where the last one went

The chapter, the dataset and the annotated PDFs sit on the project's files tab beside the tasks they belong to. Literature notes and the lab protocol live in Codex, where the next person to join reads them on day one. Nothing that matters is three inboxes deep or on one laptop.

And everything else

These sit on top of the whole product.

  • The meeting bot joins supervisions and group calls on Meet, Teams or Zoom and returns a summary with owned action items
  • Timeline and calendar carry the dates a syllabus or a submission window fixed months ago
  • Goals track the term's outcomes: pass the module, submit the paper, schedule the defence
  • Files keep drafts, datasets and PDFs on the project they belong to, not in a mailbox
  • GitHub linking connects commits and pull requests to tasks, for the groups that ship code
  • Ten interface languages, a high-contrast palette and a text-size setting on every account
See the full platform
What we don't claim

The honest edges.

  • Noots is not a reference manager and not an LMS. It does not format citations, host course content or grade anything - drafts and PDFs attach to the work, and your library lives in the tool built for it.
  • Your university's systems stay the source of record for enrolment, grades and funding. Noots holds the work of studying and researching, not the institution's records.
  • The bot records the meetings you send it to - supervisions, group meetings, lab meetings. It is not a lecture-capture system.
  • Noots holds no FERPA, SOC 2 or ISO 27001 attestation, and does not claim one.
The shape of the work

How Academia & Research actually runs.

Each of these is a project in Noots - its own board, tab strip, meetings, calendar and members. They are not pre-built modules and we will not pretend they are: what the industry gives you is the right defaults around them.

01Coursework & assignments
02Literature review
03Experiments & data
04Group projects
05Paper & conference submissions
06Thesis & defence
07Semester planning
08Lab onboarding
Questions

The ones buyers ask first.

Is this for students or for research staff?
Both, because the shape of the work is the same: a module, a study and a thesis are all projects with fixed dates, files and meetings. A solo PhD runs three boards. A lab group adds shared protocols in Codex, an experiment log and a weekly meeting the bot records. If you run the institution rather than study or research at it, Education is the page you want.
Can it manage my citations and reading list?
It will hold them, not format them. Papers and annotated PDFs attach to the project, literature notes live in Codex, and a reading list is a checklist like any other. Noots is not a reference manager: keep Zotero or your tool of choice for the bibliography, and keep the work of reading - who reads what, by when, and what it changed - on the board.
How does a five-person group project actually use it?
One shared project. The brief and the deadlines go on the timeline, the work splits into tasks with owners, a poll finds the weekly hour, and the bot records the meeting so decisions become assigned actions instead of memories. When the module ends the project is archived and the group dissolves, and nothing lingers in one person's folders.
My supervisor will not have a bot in the room. Is that the end of it?
No. The browser extension captures the call from your side instead, with no bot joining and nothing to explain at the start of the meeting, and it produces the same write-up. It is also the honest answer to a room where somebody has not consented to a recorder: ask first, every time. Noots gives you two ways to record, not a way around the question.
What does it cost a student?
The free plan is genuinely free: no card and no trial clock, and a module or a thesis fits inside it comfortably. Paid plans exist for larger groups and heavier meeting use. Every limit is printed as a number on the pricing page rather than as an asterisk, and each of those numbers is read straight out of the code that enforces it.

Open a workspace that already knows Academia & Research.

Answer what your organisation does, review what gets installed, and start with the boards, meetings, chat and calendar already in the right shape.

Free to start · No credit card required